Historical
Models of the Atom
Leucippus' and Democritus' Atom
Our English word “atom” comes from a Greek word “atomos” meaning
the smallest unit of matter. Leucippus and Democritus, Greek philosophers
of the late 5th century BC, taught that the smallest unit of matter,
the atom, was irreducible and indestructible. “They believed
that everything in the universe was composed of atoms.... There
were an infinite number of atoms.... Atoms differed as to their
size, shape, and perhaps their weight.”
Leucippus and Democritus came to their opinions about atoms by
means of deduction: They knew that materials on earth, such as rocks,
water or sand, are stable. For example, rocks don't just appear
and then disappear. The early Greek scientists also could see that
if they broke a piece of gold into two pieces, it was still gold
(same color, soft metal, etc.). But they asked, how small could
a piece of gold become by repeated breaking and still remain gold?
They deduced that when it became as small as a single atom, it would
still be gold. But if anyone could break that single atom into smaller
pieces, the gold atom would cease to exist. And we know that if
there was anything left, it certainly wouldn't be gold.
Thomson’s Atom
In 1897, J. J. Thomson showed by his famous
experiment that there were small charged particles; today we call
these particles electrons. By 1904, Thomson “developed the
picture of an atom as a sphere of positive charge, occupying the
whole volume of the atom, with electrons embedded in it.” Thomson's
atom was able to explain some chemical properties of the many
kinds of atoms known at this time (less than 100). The Thomson
model of the atom had to be abandoned, however, because new experiments
showed that at least most of the positive charge (from protons)
was concentrated in the center of the atom, not over the entire
volume.
Rutherford's Atom
“In 1911 Rutherford put forward the hypotheses that the positive
charge of the atom was concentrated in a very small volume...within
the nucleus.” In this model, the electrons were scattered
around the volume of the atom outside the nucleus.
Bohr's Atom
In 1913, Niels Bohr proposed a theory of the
hydrogen atom (the most simple of all atoms) consisting of one
heavy proton in the center with one lighter electron in orbit
around the proton. Bohr supposed
- That electrons move in circular orbits around the atomic nucleus.
- Only
certain orbits are permitted.
- That in these
permitted orbits, the electrons would not
radiate (would not create radio waves).
- That
light of certain colors (and wavelengths)
would be created when the electron (of its own power) changed
orbits.
These postulates were entirely arbitrary and even violated the
established laws of electricity and magnetism. In spite of this,
physicists still use the Bohr model (when it is convenient).
Parson's Magneton Theory of the Atom
“By 1915, A. L. Parson knew that the Bohr model of the atom
could not be real, so he developed and even experimented on a model
of the atom where the electrons were not point-sized particles that
orbit around the atomic nucleus. In Parson's atom, the electrons
in the shells surrounding the nucleus were rings of charge (with
the shape of a toroid or donut). Since the electrostatic charge
at the surface of the these rings is rotating, each electron is
a tiny magnet. In 1918, Dr. H. Stanley Allen of the University of
Edinburgh discussed the arguments in favor of the ring electron,
showing how it removed many outstanding difficulties of other theories
of the atom. In spite of its superiority, Parson's magneton model
of the atom did not become popular (but a modern version, the Lucas
model of the atom, has now been introduced).
De Broglie's Model of Matter: Particle-Wave Duality
“About 1924, Louis de Broglie proposed that all particles
of matter (from single atoms to large objects) moving at some velocity
would have the properties of a wave. Today, most physicists take
this farther and say that all material objects actually are waves
until they are measured or observed in some way. When this takes
place, the wave is said to collapse and turn into an object. An
example of this notion of reality is given by the famous Cornell
physicist N. David Mermin who says "We now know that moon is
demonstrably not there when nobody looks."
Schrodinger's Wave Model of the Atom
“"In 1925, soon after de Broglie had put forward his
ideas, Schrodinger used them [to write] a wave equation to describe
this new mechanics of particles." Schrodinger's model of the
atom is not a physical model (where an object has size, shape and
boundaries) but is a mathematical model (an equation where objects
are point particles.) The equation is useful to predict some properties
of objects (or atoms), but is not able to describe the object (or
atom) itself.
Dirac's Model of the Atom
“The Dirac model is an equation that includes imaginary numbers.
It is not an attempt to describe the objective reality of the physical
electron, but to predict the various levels of energy that the electron
may have at various times. There appears to be a serious problem
with the Dirac model which has the electrons orbiting the nucleus.
Another major assumption of the Dirac theory is that the statistical
version of quantum wave theory or quantum mechanics is valid. Unlike
previous quantum theories of the atom that used real numbers (such
as the Bohr model and Schrodinger model), the terms and imaginary
numbers in Dirac's equation do not correspond to measurable quantities.
Standard Model of Elementary Particles
“The Standard Model of Elementary Particles is not a description
of the atom. However, we must mention it now because in modern theory,
atoms are not only waves, but when measured the atoms change into
objects composed of elementary particles. In modern physics, the
important components of the atoms are electrons, protons, and neutrons.
The Standard Model considers electrons to be true elementary particles,
either waves or point particles with inherent properties of mass,
magnetism, spin and stability. But in modern Quantum Theory, protons
are supposed to be composed of quarks; and neutrons are thought
to be composed of a different combination of quarks. Another important
part of the Standard Model is that forces between these elementary
particles are supposed to be carried by other particles that move
back and force randomly between the material particles:
- photons are supposed to be particles that carry forces between
electrons,
- mesons are supposed to be particles
that carry forces between protons and neutrons,
- gluons
are supposed to be particles that carry forces
between the quarks (which are supposed to be inside protons and
neutrons).
Lucas Model of the Atom
“In 1996, while still a high school student, Joseph Lucas
introduced his model of the atom. In this model, electrons, protons
and neutrons are all based on Bergman's Spinning Charged Ring Model
of Elementary Particles (a refinement of Parson's Magneton). The
Lucas Model of the Atom is by far the most successful of all models
of the atom ever proposed. It is a physical model that shows where
electrons are located throughout the volume of the atoms. This model
predicts the "magic numbers" 2, 8, 18, and 32 of electrons
in the filled shells and also is able to predict why the Periodic
Table of the Elements has exactly seven rows. The Lucas model also
predicts the structure of the nucleus and correctly predicts hundreds
of nuclide spins.
Earliest Model of the Atom?
The first chapter of Ezekiel’s book found in the Bible seems
to describe rings in a way that is consistent
with the most general features of atomic structure. The four rings
described by Ezekiel have the same physical arrangement and orientations
as the rings found in the Lucas model of the atom. The most important
feature of the atom is its stability, a feature emphasized by Ezekiel
for his rings. The hydrogen gas molecule consisting of two electrons
and two protons is the most simple and abundant
form of matter in the universe; and in the Lucas model, diatomic
hydrogen gas “looks” just
like the four rings described by Ezekiel.
|